Skip to main content
Skip table of contents

Are there biases in the data?


Good question! Most private investment data is contributed data and as such is likely to suffer from multiple biases: 

  • Selection bias
  • Survivorship bias
  • Backward-looking bias

Survivorship bias in particular (only observing 'winner' or the best investments) is one of the most important issues when building an index of the risk and performance of infrastructure investments. You can read more about why contributed indices tend to suffer from bias here.

EDHECinfra seeks to avoid these biases by generating its Index (or Sample) Universe using a bottom-up approach with the specific aim of building a representative sample of the investable universe: first using country or market selection rules, followed by company selection rules

As a result, the companies are included in the universe over time without pre-judging whether they will do well or badly, survive or default or go bankrupt.

Things to consider

The indices are constructed from the bottom up, with a representative set of 700+ infrastructure companies and 2,000+ private debt instruments spanning over 20 years.

This universe also includes firms that have faced problems and defaulted or even gone bankrupt; for example, the nine Spanish toll road companies that went into administration in 2012-2013 as well as the UK power plants which emerged from their PPA during a very unfavourable price environment and subsequently filed for bankruptcy. They have also included projects that experienced delays, lower-than-expected traffic and even developer bankruptcy. 

As a result, some of the risk and low or negative returns reported in the EDHECinfra indices are more representative of what the average investor might expect from this asset class. 

Related topics

JavaScript errors detected

Please note, these errors can depend on your browser setup.

If this problem persists, please contact our support.